🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's lawmakers have decided to pull out from an global treaty created to safeguard females from abuse, covering family violence, following extensive and heated debates in the parliament.

Several thousand of demonstrators gathered in Riga this week to oppose the decision. The ultimate authority now rests with Head of State the nation's president, who must determine whether to approve or reject the legislation.

Known as the European treaty, the 2011 agreement only became active in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, mandating governments to develop laws and support services to end all forms of violence.

The Baltic nation has become the first EU country to initiate the process of withdrawing from the convention. The transcontinental nation pulled out in 2021, a decision that rights groups characterized as a significant regression for gender equality.

Political Controversy and Resistance

The treaty was ratified by the European Union in last year, yet traditionalist groups have argued that its emphasis on equal rights undermines traditional families and advances what they term "gender ideology".

Following a lengthy discussion in the Saeima, lawmakers decided by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the convention, a action proposed by opposition parties but backed by representatives from one of the three coalition parties.

The outcome represents a setback for moderate conservative Prime Minister the nation's PM, who stood with protesters outside parliament earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will persist in our struggle so that abuse will not prevail," she declared to the crowd.

Ideological Disagreements and Reactions

One of the primary political groups supporting the exit is a nationalist party, whose leader has urged the public to select from what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "gender ideology with multiple sexes".

Latvia's human rights commissioner the rights official appealed for the agreement not to be made political, while the group the rights organization asserted it was "not a danger to Latvian values, it was an instrument to achieve them".

The Thursday's vote has sparked widespread outcry both within the country and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand individuals have endorsed a Latvian petition calling for the convention to be maintained. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has announced a protest for the coming week, accusing MPs of ignoring the will of the nation's citizens.

International Worries and Potential Future Actions

The head of the European organization's legislative body stated that the Baltic state had made a rash decision driven by false information. He characterized it as an "unprecedented and extremely worrying step backward for female equality and human rights in Europe".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the convention four years ago, cases of gender-based killings and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not secure a supermajority majority, the head of state could possibly send back the bill for further consideration if he holds concerns.

President the national leader stated on social media that he would assess the vote according to constitutional requirements, "taking into account state and legal considerations, instead of ideological or political perspectives".

Recently, another component of the governing alliance, the Progressives, indicated it would not exclude appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a concerning situation for gender equality not only in our nation but across the continent," commented a rights activist.

• Family violence rates have been rising in several EU countries
• The Istanbul Convention mandates specific safeguards for survivors of gender-based violence
• Latvia's decision could influence comparable discussions in other EU countries